Site logo

Tombazis seeks to allay drivers fears over 2026 regs

NEWS STORY
19/08/2025

"The rules are evolving," insists the FIA's Single-Seater Director Nikolas Tombazis in reaction to drivers claims.

Following initial runs in the simulator, a number of drivers, most notably Max Verstappen and Charles Leclerc, have expressed concern at next year's regulations overhaul, the biggest in living memory.

One of the main concerns raised is that the new regs will require more focus on energy management and the like, as opposed to out and out racing.

"Obviously when you have a much bigger proportion of electrical power and a smaller proportion of ICE power, and you don't have batteries that are discharging over the entire race distance, then energy management becomes a bit more of a challenge," admits Tombazis to Motorsport.com.

"Now the opportunity of these new cars for the participating manufacturers is to develop the batteries, the electrical systems, and so on," he adds. "I think we will see some innovation on the electrical side of the engine next year, which I think will be good. But clearly there are some challenges with the energy management, and the noises that we hear are usually related to that.

"We haven't finished the rules yet in that respect," he insists. "The rules are evolving and we knew of these issues from day one. The moment you reduce one power, and you increase the other one, we knew that there were issues to address.

"We have to go through an approval process with the PU manufacturers," he explains in terms of the potential need for changes, "so we can't just unilaterally make a change tomorrow. But by and large, when we address specific problems, the teams and PU manufacturers tend to be relatively helpful.

"I think what we have now and what we'll have at the beginning of next year is not exactly the same thing," he admits. "I'm not saying it will be completely different, but there will definitely be a lot of evolution between now and the start.

"Obviously, one of the difficulties is that it isn't always easy to get everyone to agree," he admits. "When teams and manufacturers discuss these matters, they think of a combination of the good of the sport and their own competitive position.

"Of course, one bit influences the other, so unavoidably, there will be different opinions. At the moment, the technical specification of the engines, the electrical part, and all of that is set in stone. That's not changing."

Confirming that the FIA is still working on the energy recovery side of things, he says: "I think there's a general feeling that all of these topics will have very strong levers on which to react. Those things have to do with the maximum power, how quickly it will reduce on the straights, the energy that you can recover, etc. There are all sorts of levers that we can play on, and that we are playing on."

Asked about claims that drivers will need to lift and coast on the straights, something of which Verstappen has been highly vocal, Tombazis says: "There will be quite a lot of new provisions in order to manage the energy better and to make sure that cars are not decelerating on the straights, doing funny things, or, let's say, doing unnatural things.

"What we don't want, is a situation where they have to lift off, for example, on the straights or anything like that. We will absolutely, categorically, make sure that they don't have to lift off in a particular area in order to do something with the energy or whatever. When they need to go faster, drivers will keep the pedal to the metal, as they say."

Returning to the theme of manufacturers focussing on themselves, Tombazis admits that some are proving reluctant to share their initial data.

"Some are very secretive about what they're doing, while some others are very open and very helpful in proposing things," he admits. "We are taking a lot of those ideas on board."

As for the drivers concerns, he believes that much of this could stem from the fact that they don't yet have the full picture.

"I think it's important to convey that, because some people, including the drivers testing in the simulator, don't follow the evolution of our discussions with the teams in detail. Maybe they only get a snapshot. But the reason they're driving the simulator is precisely to identify these problems, so we can solve them.

"If we didn't have drivers in the simulator, we wouldn't have all this feedback. We can do quite a lot with simulations ourselves, but you actually need a driver in a car and get a lot of feedback. That's what is going on these months."

LATEST NEWS

more news >

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images

POST A COMMENT

or Register for a Pitpass ID to have your say

Please note that all posts are reactively moderated and must adhere to the site's posting rules and etiquette.

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

 

1. Posted by Anthony, 6 minutes ago

"Very interesting comments from @Laps and, sadly, I fear that he is not wrong.

So the FIA response to the concerns of leading drivers seems to be “don’t worry - we haven’t finished making up the rules yet”. Bearing in mind it is now the second half of August, the very fact that they are still working out what the rules should be is itself a cause for significant concern."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by Laps, 27 minutes ago

"Sorry Nik, but you are on a hiding to zero on this one. It’s a typical example of why ‘Top Down’ management is not normally the best option; and when Lady Physics is to be involved this is almost a certain to become true.

The original Top Down edict was that energy would be 50/50 ICE and electric. The electric component was subsequently reduced when the first feedback was received, but it still remains at an impractical percentage.
So why is this? Well the vast majority of energy provided to a Race Car goes into two different areas: Overcoming Drag (resistance due to speed) and Overcoming Inertia (Acceleration). The relationship between these two is Circuit dependent. Drag is high at Circuits such as Spa and Monza and a lower percentage at Monaco and Hungary. Why is this important? Well only energy related to inertia can be recovered (under braking) and even then only a portion of it. The (arbitrarily)mandated percentage of electrical power in the 2026 regs far exceeds this. The ICE Motors will therefore have to be run, when not being used for motive power, just to provide the required battery replenishment. To make matters worse the 2026 Motors are also less efficient than the 2025 models because of the mandated deletion of the MGU-H. This previously produced a certain amount of ‘free’ energy, so it’s removal is almost certainly a purely commercial decision to favour the Engine Manufacturers.
All in all the only word that comes to mind with regard to the ‘energy’ aspect of the new Regs is ‘cluster’.
But I just hope I’m wrong.
"

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by NS Biker, 59 minutes ago

"If his objective was to ease concerns and build confidence, sure feels like he didn't and he is still stumbling around in the woods.
Must say am looking forward to the first test sessions. From a technical perspective, should be highly entertaining.
"

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Share this page

X

Copyright © Pitpass 2002 - 2025. All rights reserved.

about us  |  advertise  |  contact  |  privacy & security  |  rss  |  terms