Site logo

McLaren defends Piastri position swap

NEWS STORY
10/09/2025

Despite widespread criticism, McLaren stands by its decision to order Oscar Piastri to yield position to his teammate.

Other than being soundly beaten by Max Verstappen, McLaren added to its Monza misery by controversially calling on championship leader Piastri to hand second place over to Lando Norris.

Having opted to extend both drivers opening stints, with Norris running second and Piastri third, it was the Briton who had first call in terms of pitting. However, with Leclerc having previously stopped and increasingly a threat to the Australian, Norris was asked if he would defer to his teammate. He agreed.

Piastri stopped on Lap 45 (of 53) while Norris stopped a lap later.

Unfortunately a problem with the left-front wheel-gun meant that Norris lost several seconds during the stop and emerged behind the Australian, both having now been passed by Max Verstappen who had pitted on Lap 37.

It was then McLaren made the controversial decision to tell Piastri to hand the position back to his teammate.

"Oscar this is a bit like Hungary last year," Piastri's engineer Tom Stallard told the Australian. "We pitted in this order for team reasons. Please let Lando pass and you're free to race."

Meanwhile, Norris's engineer, Will Jospeph was telling the Briton: "Lando, we're going to re-establish the order. So he will let you past, then you'll be free to race. He might let you through into Turn 1 this time around."

"We said that a slow pit stop was part of racing," argued Piastri. "I don't really get what's changed here. But if you really want to do it then I'll do it."

"Let's have Strat 7," said Stallard. "Suggest to let him through into Turn 1. Let through into Turn 1ne. This is the same as Hungary last year. I know it's painful, but you will have five laps remaining from now."

Piastri duly obliged, and though free to race, with Norris advised that his teammate would have DRS, they held position until the flag, at which point Jospeh told the Briton: "Apologies about the stop."

While there was no apparent bad feeling between the drivers in the moments after the race or in the cool down room, where they were seen laughing, social media went into meltdown (no doubt much to Liberty Media's delight).

"I think that the pit stop situation is not only a matter of fairness, it's a matter of consistency with our principles," explained team boss Andrea Stella.

"Wherever the championship goes, what's important is that the championship runs within the principles and the racing values that we have at McLaren and that we have created together with our drivers," he continued. "The situation whereby we swap the drivers is not only related to the pit stop, and it is useful that I clarify this, it's also related to the fact that we wanted to sequence the pitstop of the two cars by stopping Oscar first and then Lando.

"We had the clear intent that this should have not led to a swap of position. It was just done because we were covering Leclerc, and at the same time we were waiting until the last possible moment to see if there had been a red flag or a Safety Car.

"So we pursued the team interest," he insisted, "and to capitalise as much as possible on this interest, we needed to go first with Oscar, then with Lando, but the clear intent was this is not going to deliver a swap of positions. The fact that we went first with Oscar, compounded by the slow pit stop of Lando, then led to a swap of positions, and we thought it was absolutely the right thing to go back to the situation pre-existing the pit stop and then let the guys race.

"This is what we did, and this is what we think is in compliance with our principles.

"We will review the case," he added. "We will also review the situation whereby it was a slow pit stop in isolation. We already have our principles in relation to that. We will review our principles in relation to that and reinforce the direction if this is in agreement with our drivers."

Asked about Hungary last year, where the positions were reversed and Norris was far more unwilling to oblige, Stella said: "The difference from Hungary was the sequence compounded by the slow stop. You could argue that from the outside that's a very different set of circumstances. It would be slightly different because Lando would have still been ahead had the pitstop gone as planned."

"It's something that we'll discuss," said a diplomatic Piastri at race end, "we have discussed it before.

"I think today was a fair request," he added. "Lando qualified ahead, was ahead the whole race and lost that spot through no fault of his own.

"I said what I had to say on the radio, and once I got the second request, then I'm not going to go against the team, I think there's a lot of people to protect and a culture to protect outside of just Lando and ultimately that's a very important thing going forward."

"We're not idiots," said Norris, "we have plans for different things. If there were four cars between me and Oscar, of course he's not going to let me back past. But in a situation where we weren't racing, in a situation where we can just be fair, then you'd expect to be fair as a team. They don't want to be the reason to upset one driver or another through no fault of their own, and today was not my fault.

"If I came flat out into my pit box and I hit all my mechanics out the way, I don't expect to get the position back," he added. "But today was out of my control.

"In the end, I don't want it to win this way, through getting given positions or anything like that. And the same thing with Oscar. But we don't want to lose a win like that either. We do what we think is correct as a team, no matter what you say or what your opinions are, and we stick to doing it our way."

However, like his teammate, and with the stakes increasing with every race that passes, Norris admits that the situation needs reviewing.

Check out our Sunday gallery from Monza here.

LATEST NEWS

more news >

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images

POST A COMMENT

or Register for a Pitpass ID to have your say

Please note that all posts are reactively moderated and must adhere to the site's posting rules and etiquette.

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

 

1. Posted by Ricardo_sanchez, 17/09/2025 17:20

"@Kenji - “race fixing” isn’t a term in the FIA rulebook. The rules distinguish between team orders (legal again since 2011, and legal before 2002) and fraudulent conduct/bringing the sport into disrepute. McLaren’s decision at Monza was transparent, legal team management, not fraud.

Context matters. Here, you frame it as if it this was some sort of underhand arrangement whilst completely ignoring the concept of team orders. "

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by kenji, 15/09/2025 14:58

"So telling a driver to slow down and let a competitor past to in effect alter the existing race order is not race fixing!!! "

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by Ricardo_sanchez, 14/09/2025 11:02

"@kenji - Since 2011 team orders have been explicitly legal (again). The regs obviously ban fraud, but not a team openly restoring its own drivers’ order after a pit error. McLaren’s decision was transparent, within the rules, and nothing like race fixing."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

4. Posted by kenji, 10/09/2025 2:21

"I have been searching for the relevant rules covering 'race result manipulation' and apparently there is within the sporting regs an avenue for challenges of race fixing or attempts to do so. It would be useful if we could see more data concerning this aspect as it certainly is blatant, 'in your face' by McLaren."

Rating: Negative (-1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

5. Posted by ffracer, 09/09/2025 22:12

"Excellent points everyone.

I get rewarding Lando's loyalty when, in only 2023, they qualified in the back a few times... so who knows what Zak Brown promised Lando then. In truth, Lando has been towing the party line for some time, at least since Carlos Sainz was his teammate. Having said that, Andrea Stella and Brown have been most vigilant in every interview that their drivers are free to race but during most races, the team has intervened... and on some occasions, the pitwall being petulant on the radio with their drivers being the ones to take it on the chin.

Please, you are convincing noone and are going to provoke and inherit an absolute mess all by yourselves. The drivers have enough racing on the limit than to start doubting their own sacred teams. "

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

6. Posted by Schrodinger's cat, 09/09/2025 11:27

""All credit to Piastri for taking it on the chin"

What else can he do? He'd hardly throw away driving the currently best car in F1, especially as he can still win the Driver's Championship. Maybe, after that McLaren might stop favouring Norris, but if not, and with all new cars in 2026, other teams might became more attractive to Piastri."

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

7. Posted by Schrodinger's cat, 09/09/2025 11:20

"I wish Stella would stop gas lighting us all, and just admit that Lando is your preferred driver.

It's BS that Piastri need to stop first. Norris opted to pit second, as that would give him fresher tyres at the end. And, with his margin over Piastri, there was no chance of being undercut.

And, in Hungary last year, Norris was very, very reluctant to give up the position he gained, by pitting first, because he was under threat of being passed, and undercutting Piastri.

@Mad Matt, there was no undercut. Norris was passed only because on his slow stop!

@hussainahm, yes McLaren sabotaged Norris' pit stop, just like they sabotaged his car last week. ROFL

@Hobgoblin, Piastri dropped back because he wouldn't have been able to pass Norris, because of the team's rules. The one about not taking the other car out when passing, like Norris almost did in Canada. Norris would've forced Piastri off the track, rather then allowing him to pass."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

8. Posted by Hobgoblin, 09/09/2025 8:51

"All credit to Piastri for taking it on the chin - well done sir.

That said, he was free to race, had DRS, and yet dropped back from Norris. Norris was the faster driver on the day."

Rating: Positive (4)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

9. Posted by Wokingchap, 08/09/2025 20:41

"Every team gives team orders, so whats wrong and whats all the stupid fuss about."

Rating: Positive (3)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

10. Posted by hussainahm, 08/09/2025 12:49

"I can imagine if team orders were not given, there would still be a ruckus but this time people would say McLaren sabotaged Lando's stop to give Oscar a bigger points margin compared to a still-fast Max who might be a threat as the season progresses."

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

11. Posted by Celtic Tiger, 08/09/2025 12:10

""So we perused team interests" cuts through the BS and sums it all up. Judging by their calls in the past and especially at Monza that "team interest" is having Norris be WDC rather than Piastri. Sorry Mr. Stella, If it walks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck. McLaren proving once again that they hadn't learnt a thing from 2007. "

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

12. Posted by Mad Matt, 08/09/2025 11:01

"Looks reasonable to me. Driver A gives up his lead driver preference for pitstops to help his team mate, driver B.

Driver A then suffers a slow pitstop so driver B returns the favour by giving back the place he'd picked up with the undercut and driver A's slow pitstop.

On the other hand, if driver A had only lost time in the pitstop with nothing else going on then it would be unreasonable.

At least that's how I see it."

Rating: Positive (2)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

13. Posted by Chester, 08/09/2025 10:19

"When you need that many words to justify your decision, you are wrong. And McLaren know it. "

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Share this page

X

Copyright © Pitpass 2002 - 2025. All rights reserved.

about us  |  advertise  |  contact  |  privacy & security  |  rss  |  terms