Site logo

Ecclestone denies cover up over infamous Singapore race

NEWS STORY
26/09/2025

Baffled as to why the 'Crashgate' case ever got to caught, Bernie Ecclestone denies manipulation of the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix.

The case in question being Felipe Massa's challenge that the (then) F1 boss, along with the FIA, conspired to cover up the manipulation of the event.

Massa was leading the race when Nelson Piquet Jnr crashed out, thereby bringing out the Safety Car. Piquet's teammate Fernando Alonso (remember him?) took the opportunity to pit, as did many others including Massa. However, as the Brazilian headed down the pitlane he was forced to stop as the refuelling hose was still attached to his car. The resultant delay not only cost him the victory, according to his legal challenge it cost him the world championship.

In the final race of the season, Massa appeared to have won the title. However, in the final corner of the final lap, Lewis Hamilton passed Timo Glock for fifth, enough to secure the crown.

Almost a year later, after being dropped by Renault, Piquet claimed that he had been ordered to deliberately crash in Singapore, in order to aid his teammate.

Whilst initially rigorously denying the claim, Renault subsequently relented and following an investigation by the FIA team boss Flavio Briatore was banned from the sport as was Director of Engineering Pat Symonds, with the French team also being disqualified from the sport, albeit suspended for two years.

Briatore was banned from F1 permanently and Symonds for five years, but both bans were subsequently overturned.

Along with Spygate, Crashgate was one of the sport's scandals that dominated the front pages, but in time it died down.

Then, in 2023, in an interview with Germany's F1-Insider, Ecclestone was quoted as saying that he and (then) FIA president Max Mosley were aware of what had happened in Singapore.

"Piquet Jr had told his father Nelson that he had been asked by the team to deliberately drive into the wall at a certain point in time in order to trigger a safety car phase and help his team-mate Alonso," said the former F1 supremo. "We decided not to do anything for the time being. We wanted to protect the sport and save it from a huge scandal.

"There was a rule at the time that a world championship ranking was untouchable after the FIA awards ceremony at the end of the year," he added. "So Hamilton was presented with the world championship trophy and everything was fine."

Fine with everyone except Massa that is, for the Brazilian then began his legal challenge.

"Accountability is key to preventing future fraud," the Brazilian told The Times. "Those entrusted with protecting the sport directly violated their duties, and they cannot be allowed to benefit from concealing their own misconduct.

"Such conduct is unacceptable in any sphere of life," he added, "especially in a sport followed by millions, including children. We will pursue this to the very end in order to achieve a just and fair outcome, for myself, for motorsport in Brazil, and for the sport as a whole."

Ecclestone was quick to deny the claim.

"There is no way in the world anyone could change or cancel that race," he told The Times. "There is always something going on where someone would like to cancel it if they could.

"To try to persuade the president of the FIA to call a special meeting where the FIA would have to cancel the race... there were no provisions for that to happen," he insisted.

"Max knew there was not enough evidence at the time to do anything. It only started later when young Nelson decided he wanted to say something when he found out he was not going to get a seat for the following year. Max was not saying we should cover this up but just that it was not good for the image of Formula 1."

Asked about his comments to F1-Insider, he said: "This was an interview I gave to someone in Germany. And the guy at the time, his English wasn't that good and he was taking notes, and it was picked up by someone in England.

"The lawyers for myself, the FIA and F1 do not understand how it can be heard in a court," he added.

The case gets underway on October 28.

LATEST NEWS

more news >

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images

POST A COMMENT

or Register for a Pitpass ID to have your say

Please note that all posts are reactively moderated and must adhere to the site's posting rules and etiquette.

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

 

1. Posted by ffracer, 01/10/2025 17:13

"@givememychoice - I appreciate your opinion but, respectfully, it's not complicated. This crime came around the same time as when football matches/teams were being caught and found guilty of game fixing. I verily believe that this was the greater evil that Ecclestone was terrified of and hence the lifetime bans of key Renault figures and the sweeping hoping to be perceived as fully dealt with... but, with all the skullduggery and elaborate, premeditated actions coming out with 20/20 hindsight vision, it becomes just as heinous as the doping scandals and the game fixing. Cheating is cheating. The level of elaborateness and premeditation determines the punishment. Flavio Briatore was given a lifetime ban, that's how bad it was. Ove Andersson and Toyota Rallying were found guilty of cheating - using elaborate turbos, bypasses and wastegates (?), stripped of all points and given a year ban... The fact that the then governing body knew of the full ramifications of the scandal and chose to do nothing is even worse. The other sports chose to deal with the cheating and do the ethical thing gained them immense respect and popularity because it proved that they are legitimate, have teeth... this continuance of denial/damage control only makes fans wonder what other ugly secrets lurk in the depths... not good."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by givememychoice, 01/10/2025 13:19

"I think this is a supremely complicated situation.
When Lance Armstrong was disqualified, it was simply a case of removing him from the race classification. Its a simple time accumulation, (while there are bonus seconds etc available, i am pretty sure he never won as a result of these). The Guilty party is punished, the best non guilty party wins. Their actions remained more or less constant.
With crashgate:
1: the crash did not cause massa to have the bad pit stop. (it possibly contributed due to it being rushed/unplanned)
2: the benefactor in the championship was not the guilty party. (which is a massively key issue)
3: Lewis may have altered his efforts in the following races....if you know you have a point gap, you will maybe settle for 2nd rather than make a dive for 1st place.
4: However, the knowledge was there in senior officials, but they chose not to act to preserve monetary value in the sports value.

My view is, the championship standings remain as is, however, a significant fine is levvied on the organisation/individuals (bernie) with Massa being the recipient.

"

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by ffracer, 01/10/2025 11:24

"Other mighty sports authorities had finally done the right and ethical thing and their sport have grown from their respective nightmares. Cycling (the LanceArmstrong and team
scandal) and the Olympics to name two. Each were catastrophic but worldwide respect and empathy ultimately grew their fanbase."

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

4. Posted by kenji, 30/09/2025 2:17

"Given the new evidence, as enunciated by Bernie to Bach, is undeniably proven to be a fact, and a cover up was considered to be fraudulent then, then surely it remains fraudulent now. Massa needs to win this case if for no other reason than to establish that time does not eradicate the stain of any race manipulation. I do wonder sometimes how these guys can sleep soundly at night!!!"

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

5. Posted by ffracer, 28/09/2025 6:37

"@ Riccardo_sanchez: Agreed. Bernie Ecclestone was reported as being well aware
of the scandalous act, spoke with the Piquets then, explained how the governing body chose to shove it under the rug to protect the most vulnerable sport then but encouraged Felipe Massa to pursue the lawsuit. Ferrari was also reported as being in supporting their former driver. Now, the total denial and 180° difference makes him sound completely foolhardy and embarrassing.

@Celtic Tiger and others : Celtic, almost always enjoy your posts for their wit and logic but I must respectfully disagree with your stance on this. Bernies 2023 'confession' absolutely infuriated me then and still feel compelled for the governing body to facilitate and do the right thing here. I will just say that, in my humble opinion, that a few championships were decided by gross negligence and dangerous driving. The 1990 and 1994 championship deciding races were incompetently officiated with the vainquers results being handled in the exact same manner like the outcome of the 1997
championship with the most dangerous driving antics being punished and their points tally being completely stripped. The precedent set by the most brazen vigilante driving on both occasions tarnished this great sport making the great champions of the sport, who never conducted themselves in this manner as less worthy. Sir Jackie Stewart was correct in that infamous interview when he pointed out how almost all of the other brilliant champions had never resorted to this dangerous driving to win their glorious championship wins... and that said it all really."

Rating: Positive (2)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

6. Posted by Ricardo_sanchez, 26/09/2025 23:42

"In 2023, Ecclestone clearly told Ralf Bach of F1-Insider that he and Mosley knew about the Singapore manipulation, chose “to protect the sport,” and believed the result could and should have been invalidated under the rules at the time. If you read the complete Bach interview,
it’s unmistakable ‘Bernie-speak’.

Yet now he is denying that any such course was possible, saying there were “no provisions” to cancel the race, and attributing the discrepancy to a non-native English journalist misinterpreting his words. That is a complete reversal of his earlier position.

This isn’t simply a shift in recollection. It’s a carefully choreographed retreat aimed at damage control. I don’t think Massa has any prospect of success but I look forward to the Bach interview being examined in court. Let’s hope he has retained a tape recording and/or his notes from the interview. "

Rating: Positive (3)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

7. Posted by Celtic Tiger, 26/09/2025 21:28

"I don't agree with this lawsuit as its definitely opening up a can of worms and setting a bad precedent. How far does one take it? comb through every championship, every race win in the sport's history and sue on the basis of what ifs?
I understand that for Massa this is a hard pill but it is what it is and he needs to make peace with that for the sake of his mental and spiritual well-being. Hamilton was WDC that year, the trophy was handed out, the curtains fell on the ceremony 17 years ago. It's in the sport's history now and nothing will change that.
The lawyers winding him up by coaching this martyr narrative in his ear that this lawsuit is for the greater good is pretty slimy. When in fact, the only real winner in this would be them when they get their hands on a chunk of a multi million dollar payout."

Rating: Positive (4)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

8. Posted by Anthony, 26/09/2025 20:41

"Bernie is surely right to say “Max knew there was not enough evidence at the time…”.

In the UK Investigation of the Clapham Railway Accident Anthony Hidden QC said “There is almost no human action or decision that cannot be made to look flawed and less sensible in the misleading light of hindsight”. I can’t help feeling that this is very true in this case."

Rating: Positive (2)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

9. Posted by Chester, 26/09/2025 12:32

"I recall that Grosjean took out Alonso (and may be several other cars) on the opening lap of a race long ago during the 2012 season. Alonso lost the WDC to Vettel that year by 3 points.

As they say, shit happens. And that is my opinion of crashgate. How many times have teams run illegal equipment and won? Who knows? Shit happens."

Rating: Positive (4)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

10. Posted by yakker, 26/09/2025 10:40

"Will Hill now try to get 1994 corrected?"

Rating: Positive (3)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Share this page

X

Copyright © Pitpass 2002 - 2025. All rights reserved.

about us  |  advertise  |  contact  |  privacy & security  |  rss  |  terms